<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 4 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26160</link>
    <description>Earlier assessment findings on the same factual issue were treated as relevant and cogent evidence in a later year, so the income from the rubber plantation standing in the assessee&#039;s wife&#039;s name was upheld as includible in the assessee&#039;s agricultural income in the absence of fresh material or changed circumstances. The court also upheld the estimated assessment, noting that the assessee had not maintained proper accounts or substantiated the returns, and that a best judgment estimate will not be interfered with unless it is shown to be illegal or manifestly unreasonable. The writ petition was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:26:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 4 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26160</link>
      <description>Earlier assessment findings on the same factual issue were treated as relevant and cogent evidence in a later year, so the income from the rubber plantation standing in the assessee&#039;s wife&#039;s name was upheld as includible in the assessee&#039;s agricultural income in the absence of fresh material or changed circumstances. The court also upheld the estimated assessment, noting that the assessee had not maintained proper accounts or substantiated the returns, and that a best judgment estimate will not be interfered with unless it is shown to be illegal or manifestly unreasonable. The writ petition was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>