<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 132 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410554</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant exemption to a poultry farmer from sales tax for the assessment year 2000-01. The Court ruled that owning the land where the farm was conducted was not a prerequisite for claiming exemption; rather, owning and operating the farm within the State was sufficient. The Court also held that the amendment to the exemption notification could not have retrospective operation, thus rejecting the State&#039;s argument that owning the land was necessary for exemption post-amendment. The Court dismissed the State&#039;s revision, affirming the farmer&#039;s entitlement to exemption based on owning and operating the farm within the State.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 132 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410554</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant exemption to a poultry farmer from sales tax for the assessment year 2000-01. The Court ruled that owning the land where the farm was conducted was not a prerequisite for claiming exemption; rather, owning and operating the farm within the State was sufficient. The Court also held that the amendment to the exemption notification could not have retrospective operation, thus rejecting the State&#039;s argument that owning the land was necessary for exemption post-amendment. The Court dismissed the State&#039;s revision, affirming the farmer&#039;s entitlement to exemption based on owning and operating the farm within the State.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>