<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410552</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the Assessing Officer had provided reasons for rejecting objections raised by the Payment Systems Company, emphasizing that reassessment cannot involve a review of the original assessment decision. The Court underscored that objections must be addressed in accordance with the law, and all relevant materials should be considered during reassessment. Referring to Constitutional Court judgments, the Court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings, concluding that there was no basis to interfere with the orders and declined to impose costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410552</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the Assessing Officer had provided reasons for rejecting objections raised by the Payment Systems Company, emphasizing that reassessment cannot involve a review of the original assessment decision. The Court underscored that objections must be addressed in accordance with the law, and all relevant materials should be considered during reassessment. Referring to Constitutional Court judgments, the Court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings, concluding that there was no basis to interfere with the orders and declined to impose costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>