<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 129 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410551</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity and legality of the detention order. The court found that the delay in issuing the order was justified due to the complexity of the investigation. It ruled that the detenu&#039;s right to documents was not violated as he was provided with relevant materials. The detention order based on confessional statements was deemed valid, and the detaining authority&#039;s decision was considered appropriate despite the detenu being in judicial custody. The court also held that the Advisory Board considering the case was competent, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 129 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410551</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity and legality of the detention order. The court found that the delay in issuing the order was justified due to the complexity of the investigation. It ruled that the detenu&#039;s right to documents was not violated as he was provided with relevant materials. The detention order based on confessional statements was deemed valid, and the detaining authority&#039;s decision was considered appropriate despite the detenu being in judicial custody. The court also held that the Advisory Board considering the case was competent, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>