<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 103 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that no disallowance under Section 43B was justified as the assessee did not claim unpaid statutory dues as expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the exclusive method of accounting and non-claiming of these dues as expenses in their ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 103 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that no disallowance under Section 43B was justified as the assessee did not claim unpaid statutory dues as expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the exclusive method of accounting and non-claiming of these dues as expenses in their ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>