<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing based on justifications provided by the appellant. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication on merits within a specified timeline, emphasizing the importance of substantive justice over technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing based on justifications provided by the appellant. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication on merits within a specified timeline, emphasizing the importance of substantive justice over technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>