<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 97 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s findings that the transactions were sham, aimed at introducing unaccounted money as long-term capital gains. Lack of credible evidence and suspicious transaction patterns led to the dismissal of appeals. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessees regarding the alleged fraudulent share transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:34:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 97 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s findings that the transactions were sham, aimed at introducing unaccounted money as long-term capital gains. Lack of credible evidence and suspicious transaction patterns led to the dismissal of appeals. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessees regarding the alleged fraudulent share transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>