<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 777 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that disallowance of outstanding service tax liability under Section 43B was not justified as the liability was not reflected in the Profit and Loss Account. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 777 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that disallowance of outstanding service tax liability under Section 43B was not justified as the liability was not reflected in the Profit and Loss Account. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>