<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1251 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296709</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court declined writ relief where the operative date for taking over management and possession under the impugned order had already passed, rendering the requested certiorari and mandamus moot. It also noted that the order was appealable, so an alternative statutory remedy was available. On those grounds, the Court refused to quash the impugned exhibits and declined to restrain the respondents from proceeding with takeover, dismissing both prayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1251 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296709</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court declined writ relief where the operative date for taking over management and possession under the impugned order had already passed, rendering the requested certiorari and mandamus moot. It also noted that the order was appealable, so an alternative statutory remedy was available. On those grounds, the Court refused to quash the impugned exhibits and declined to restrain the respondents from proceeding with takeover, dismissing both prayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>