<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Indexed Cost of Acquisition</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117399</link>
    <description>For indexation purposes, the phrase referring to the year &quot;in which the asset was held by the assessee&quot; should be read to mean the first year the previous owner held the property, which determines the base year and cost for indexation. The practical issue posed is whether a transferee in a succession chain may instead adopt a recent market value as the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains despite an earlier lower purchase cost and subsequent conversions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:58:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Indexed Cost of Acquisition</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117399</link>
      <description>For indexation purposes, the phrase referring to the year &quot;in which the asset was held by the assessee&quot; should be read to mean the first year the previous owner held the property, which determines the base year and cost for indexation. The practical issue posed is whether a transferee in a succession chain may instead adopt a recent market value as the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains despite an earlier lower purchase cost and subsequent conversions.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:58:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>