https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296682 Criminal proceedings were quashed where the prosecution materials, even if taken at face value, did not disclose prima facie conspiracy, abetment, cheating, or criminal breach of trust. Mere receipt or retention of remittances into the petitioner's account, without material showing participation in the plot-sale transactions, furnishing of the account for those payments, knowledge of the alleged illegal design, or a meeting of minds with the other accused, was insufficient to infer criminal conspiracy. A father-son relationship and isolated suspicious circumstances could not establish conscious participation. The Court held that continuation of the case would amount to abuse of process. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Aug 2021 09:11:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296682 Criminal proceedings were quashed where the prosecution materials, even if taken at face value, did not disclose prima facie conspiracy, abetment, cheating, or criminal breach of trust. Mere receipt or retention of remittances into the petitioner's account, without material showing participation in the plot-sale transactions, furnishing of the account for those payments, knowledge of the alleged illegal design, or a meeting of minds with the other accused, was insufficient to infer criminal conspiracy. A father-son relationship and isolated suspicious circumstances could not establish conscious participation. The Court held that continuation of the case would amount to abuse of process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296682