<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1807 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296685</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 to interfere with the impugned High Court order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. Delay in filing was condoned. The Court also clarified that any other legal issue decided by the High Court remains open to be raised by the petitioner in appropriate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 09:11:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1807 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296685</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 to interfere with the impugned High Court order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. Delay in filing was condoned. The Court also clarified that any other legal issue decided by the High Court remains open to be raised by the petitioner in appropriate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>