<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410468</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that income from letting out modules of a Software Technology park constituted business income eligible for deduction under Section 80IA of the Act. The Court emphasized that income from letting out property in an industrial park/SEZ, along with amenities and facilities, should be considered business income. The decision was based on previous rulings and a circular by the CBDT, highlighting the importance of considering all amenities provided with the leased property. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that such income should be classified as business income rather than income from house property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410468</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that income from letting out modules of a Software Technology park constituted business income eligible for deduction under Section 80IA of the Act. The Court emphasized that income from letting out property in an industrial park/SEZ, along with amenities and facilities, should be considered business income. The decision was based on previous rulings and a circular by the CBDT, highlighting the importance of considering all amenities provided with the leased property. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that such income should be classified as business income rather than income from house property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>