<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 29 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) orders for AYs 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2010-11, emphasizing the significance of the partnership deed in determining the allowance of interest and remuneration. The appeals by Revenue were dismissed based on alignment with relevant case law and specific clauses in the partnership deed, which explicitly stated no interest on capital or remuneration was payable to partners. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted for both assessment years due to the deletion of additions/disallowances forming the penalty basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 29 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) orders for AYs 2009-10 &amp;amp; 2010-11, emphasizing the significance of the partnership deed in determining the allowance of interest and remuneration. The appeals by Revenue were dismissed based on alignment with relevant case law and specific clauses in the partnership deed, which explicitly stated no interest on capital or remuneration was payable to partners. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted for both assessment years due to the deletion of additions/disallowances forming the penalty basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>