<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 26 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions. The CIT (A) correctly applied the law in deleting disallowances and additions made by the AO, emphasizing the need for satisfaction under Section 14A, recognizing liabilities under the mercantile system, and allowing PF contributions paid before the return filing date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:05:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 26 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions. The CIT (A) correctly applied the law in deleting disallowances and additions made by the AO, emphasizing the need for satisfaction under Section 14A, recognizing liabilities under the mercantile system, and allowing PF contributions paid before the return filing date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>