<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 15 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410437</link>
    <description>The CESTAT set aside the decision restricting a refund claim for duty-paid goods supplied to the Indian Navy under an exemption notification. The requirement of drop-by-drop linkage was deemed unnecessary, and the claim was found not to violate unjust enrichment principles. Compliance with warehousing permissions was considered irrelevant as all goods post-06.09.2004 were duty-paid. The reliance on CBEC Circulars post-withdrawal of warehousing facilities was deemed out of context. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing that all goods stored in the warehouse were duty-paid, and the restriction based on specific tanks was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 15 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410437</link>
      <description>The CESTAT set aside the decision restricting a refund claim for duty-paid goods supplied to the Indian Navy under an exemption notification. The requirement of drop-by-drop linkage was deemed unnecessary, and the claim was found not to violate unjust enrichment principles. Compliance with warehousing permissions was considered irrelevant as all goods post-06.09.2004 were duty-paid. The reliance on CBEC Circulars post-withdrawal of warehousing facilities was deemed out of context. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing that all goods stored in the warehouse were duty-paid, and the restriction based on specific tanks was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>