https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296666 A minor corrigendum corrected a typographical error in paragraph 6 of an earlier ITAT Delhi order by substituting the phrase stating that the issue is now squarely covered by the Delhi High Court decision. The substitution was treated as a clerical correction only, with no change to the bench's decision and no prejudice to either party. The registry was directed to serve the corrigendum on both parties and to replace the relevant paragraph in the earlier order. en-us Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:02:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296666 A minor corrigendum corrected a typographical error in paragraph 6 of an earlier ITAT Delhi order by substituting the phrase stating that the issue is now squarely covered by the Delhi High Court decision. The substitution was treated as a clerical correction only, with no change to the bench's decision and no prejudice to either party. The registry was directed to serve the corrigendum on both parties and to replace the relevant paragraph in the earlier order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296666