<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1962 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the liability of excise duty on the base tank manufactured for another company but partially allowed the appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit. The matter was remanded for further consideration, providing the appellant with a reasonable opportunity and allowing the admission of fresh evidence if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1962 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the liability of excise duty on the base tank manufactured for another company but partially allowed the appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit. The matter was remanded for further consideration, providing the appellant with a reasonable opportunity and allowing the admission of fresh evidence if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>