https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296662 A company suit must be instituted by a duly authorised person, and restoration of the company or limitation compliance does not cure the absence of valid authority. The Court also held that title over immovable property must be proved by reliable evidence of execution of the sale deed; mutation entries and revenue records alone do not establish ownership. As the plaintiff failed to prove valid institution, right, title and interest, and entitlement to possession, the claim for recovery of possession and consequential reliefs also failed. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:02:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296662 A company suit must be instituted by a duly authorised person, and restoration of the company or limitation compliance does not cure the absence of valid authority. The Court also held that title over immovable property must be proved by reliable evidence of execution of the sale deed; mutation entries and revenue records alone do not establish ownership. As the plaintiff failed to prove valid institution, right, title and interest, and entitlement to possession, the claim for recovery of possession and consequential reliefs also failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296662