https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296671 Where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists, writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be used to bypass that process, and the petitioner was relegated to file an appeal before the appellate authority. The petitioner was permitted to seek interlocutory waiver of the pre-deposit condition, and the appellate authority was directed to consider that application and the appeal on merits by a reasoned speaking order after hearing the parties. In doing so, the appellate authority must take into account the pending proceedings before the Apex Court on the levy of service tax on royalty and allied charges. The appeal was to be filed within 15 days of the order. en-us Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:02:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296671 Where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists, writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be used to bypass that process, and the petitioner was relegated to file an appeal before the appellate authority. The petitioner was permitted to seek interlocutory waiver of the pre-deposit condition, and the appellate authority was directed to consider that application and the appeal on merits by a reasoned speaking order after hearing the parties. In doing so, the appellate authority must take into account the pending proceedings before the Apex Court on the levy of service tax on royalty and allied charges. The appeal was to be filed within 15 days of the order. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296671