https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296658 An exemption under Section 20(1)(a) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 that was not withdrawn before the Repeal Act, 1999 took effect in Andhra Pradesh remained preserved by the saving provision, and the State could not rely on the repealed ceiling restrictions to refuse a no-objection certificate for change of land use. Because no withdrawal order had been passed and possession had not been taken, the land was not treated as having vested in the Government, and the old Chapter III conditions could not be enforced to deny permission. The refusal of the request for change of land use was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2021 17:11:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296658 An exemption under Section 20(1)(a) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 that was not withdrawn before the Repeal Act, 1999 took effect in Andhra Pradesh remained preserved by the saving provision, and the State could not rely on the repealed ceiling restrictions to refuse a no-objection certificate for change of land use. Because no withdrawal order had been passed and possession had not been taken, the land was not treated as having vested in the Government, and the old Chapter III conditions could not be enforced to deny permission. The refusal of the request for change of land use was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296658