https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410412 The petitioner sought a stay on the bail cancellation order issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, contending that the allegations of evidence tampering and witness influence lacked substantial evidence. The respondent accused the petitioner of fraudulent activities and misleading authorities, emphasizing the seriousness of the accusations. The Court noted the difference in considerations for granting and canceling bail, highlighting the ongoing investigation and delay in filing a complaint. Ultimately, the Court stayed the bail cancellation order, considering the petitioner's custody duration and the potential entitlement to default bail if the complaint was not filed within 60 days. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410412 The petitioner sought a stay on the bail cancellation order issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, contending that the allegations of evidence tampering and witness influence lacked substantial evidence. The respondent accused the petitioner of fraudulent activities and misleading authorities, emphasizing the seriousness of the accusations. The Court noted the difference in considerations for granting and canceling bail, highlighting the ongoing investigation and delay in filing a complaint. Ultimately, the Court stayed the bail cancellation order, considering the petitioner's custody duration and the potential entitlement to default bail if the complaint was not filed within 60 days. Case-Laws GST Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410412