https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410411 The court upheld the rejection of the appeal against a tax demand and penalty imposition, directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the remaining tax amount to stay recovery proceedings. The petitioner was required to submit a computer-generated copy of the order from the High Court's official website, along with identity proof. Respondents were given time to file counter affidavits, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures for transparency and accountability. en-us Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410411 The court upheld the rejection of the appeal against a tax demand and penalty imposition, directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the remaining tax amount to stay recovery proceedings. The petitioner was required to submit a computer-generated copy of the order from the High Court's official website, along with identity proof. Respondents were given time to file counter affidavits, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures for transparency and accountability. Case-Laws GST Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410411