<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-2009 and 2010-2011 to 2013-2014, quashing the assessment orders as they were barred by limitation. The Tribunal held that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not justified due to the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal did not rule on other grounds challenging the validity of additions, deeming them academically moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-2009 and 2010-2011 to 2013-2014, quashing the assessment orders as they were barred by limitation. The Tribunal held that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not justified due to the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal did not rule on other grounds challenging the validity of additions, deeming them academically moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>