https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296647 Cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 requires cogent material showing misuse of liberty, breach of bail conditions, interference with trial, or similarly exceptional grounds. Mere pendency of multiple criminal cases, without any conviction or proof that the accused violated conditions or obstructed the proceedings, is not enough to treat the accused as a habitual offender for cancelling bail. On the facts described, the bail order was left undisturbed because no material established grounds for interference. en-us Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 21:16:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296647 Cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 requires cogent material showing misuse of liberty, breach of bail conditions, interference with trial, or similarly exceptional grounds. Mere pendency of multiple criminal cases, without any conviction or proof that the accused violated conditions or obstructed the proceedings, is not enough to treat the accused as a habitual offender for cancelling bail. On the facts described, the bail order was left undisturbed because no material established grounds for interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296647