<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1535 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the miscellaneous application by recalling the ground for fresh adjudication regarding the disallowance of contributions to Mahindra Academy. However, the application concerning the deduction for the difference in exchange was dismissed, upholding the original decision based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Satlej Cotton Mills. The Tribunal emphasized the treatment of foreign exchange gains or losses related to capital assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 21:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1535 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the miscellaneous application by recalling the ground for fresh adjudication regarding the disallowance of contributions to Mahindra Academy. However, the application concerning the deduction for the difference in exchange was dismissed, upholding the original decision based on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Satlej Cotton Mills. The Tribunal emphasized the treatment of foreign exchange gains or losses related to capital assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>