<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalties Reduced for Alleged Diamond Smuggling Due to Lack of Evidence u/s 112(b) of Customs Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58983</link>
    <description>Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under Section 112(b) of Customs Act 1962 - The DRI investigation has not brought any such evidence except retracted confessional statements to show that Appellants have smuggled rough diamonds into India - The quantum of penalty is reduced - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:47:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalties Reduced for Alleged Diamond Smuggling Due to Lack of Evidence u/s 112(b) of Customs Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58983</link>
      <description>Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under Section 112(b) of Customs Act 1962 - The DRI investigation has not brought any such evidence except retracted confessional statements to show that Appellants have smuggled rough diamonds into India - The quantum of penalty is reduced - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:47:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>