<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26116</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the bungalow did not qualify as a guest house under section 37 of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the expenses claimed by the assessee for the bungalow&#039;s maintenance were considered legitimate. The judgment favored the assessee and went against the Department, with no costs awarded. Justice M. G. Mukherji concurred with the Court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26116</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the bungalow did not qualify as a guest house under section 37 of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the expenses claimed by the assessee for the bungalow&#039;s maintenance were considered legitimate. The judgment favored the assessee and went against the Department, with no costs awarded. Justice M. G. Mukherji concurred with the Court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>