https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410365 In bail proceedings concerning recovery of identical phensedyl codeine cough syrup bottles, the Court held that separate sampling from each bottle was not necessary at the bail stage where the bottles were the same size, carried the same batch numbers and were prepared under the same formulation. On that basis, the sampling process was not treated as infirm. The Court also observed that the objection based on Section 50 of the NDPS Act was a matter for trial, not a ground to grant bail at that stage. The bail plea was rejected. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:10:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410365 In bail proceedings concerning recovery of identical phensedyl codeine cough syrup bottles, the Court held that separate sampling from each bottle was not necessary at the bail stage where the bottles were the same size, carried the same batch numbers and were prepared under the same formulation. On that basis, the sampling process was not treated as infirm. The Court also observed that the objection based on Section 50 of the NDPS Act was a matter for trial, not a ground to grant bail at that stage. The bail plea was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410365