<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1200 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order revising the reassessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 was unsustainable. The reassessment focused on disallowing specific expenditure, and the issue of deduction under section 80IA was beyond its scope. The Tribunal quashed the order, emphasizing that reassessment is limited to assessing escaped income, not issues already addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1200 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order revising the reassessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 was unsustainable. The reassessment focused on disallowing specific expenditure, and the issue of deduction under section 80IA was beyond its scope. The Tribunal quashed the order, emphasizing that reassessment is limited to assessing escaped income, not issues already addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>