<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1198 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order. It held that the addition made by the AO regarding gain on the sale of investment was not sustainable in the eyes of the law as it was based solely on a statement without any incriminating material. The Tribunal reiterated that in the absence of such material, no addition could be made under Section 153A read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1198 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order. It held that the addition made by the AO regarding gain on the sale of investment was not sustainable in the eyes of the law as it was based solely on a statement without any incriminating material. The Tribunal reiterated that in the absence of such material, no addition could be made under Section 153A read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>