<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1197 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the AO to remove the additions for short TDS deduction and interest under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. It determined that the services provided by the appellant fell under section 194C, not 194J, due to their automated nature without human intervention. The Tribunal also granted condonation for the one-day delay in filing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:10:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1197 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the AO to remove the additions for short TDS deduction and interest under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. It determined that the services provided by the appellant fell under section 194C, not 194J, due to their automated nature without human intervention. The Tribunal also granted condonation for the one-day delay in filing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>