<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 23 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26114</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta determined that a sum of Rs. 1 lakh received as damages for non-performance of an agreement was neither a revenue receipt nor a capital gain. The Court held that as there was no transfer of a capital asset as per the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the amount did not meet the criteria of a capital asset, it did not fall under the categories of capital gain or revenue receipt. The judgment favored the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 23 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26114</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta determined that a sum of Rs. 1 lakh received as damages for non-performance of an agreement was neither a revenue receipt nor a capital gain. The Court held that as there was no transfer of a capital asset as per the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the amount did not meet the criteria of a capital asset, it did not fall under the categories of capital gain or revenue receipt. The judgment favored the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>