https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410335 The Tribunal granted the application for restoration of the company's name under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The decision included specific directions for compliance, cost payment, and asset restrictions. The restoration did not automatically reinstate disqualified directors and required an undertaking on account usage during demonetization. The Registrar retained authority for future non-compliance actions. The decision aimed to ensure statutory compliance, protect company interests, and facilitate future business prospects. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:09:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410335 The Tribunal granted the application for restoration of the company's name under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The decision included specific directions for compliance, cost payment, and asset restrictions. The restoration did not automatically reinstate disqualified directors and required an undertaking on account usage during demonetization. The Registrar retained authority for future non-compliance actions. The decision aimed to ensure statutory compliance, protect company interests, and facilitate future business prospects. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410335