https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296608 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act could not be quashed under Section 482 CrPC where the accused claimed he had resigned as director before the cheque transaction. The genuineness of the resignation, whether it was accepted by the company, and the timing and effect of Form No. 32 raised disputed questions of fact requiring evidence. Those controversies could not be resolved in quashing proceedings, so the complaint was permitted to proceed. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:07:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296608 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act could not be quashed under Section 482 CrPC where the accused claimed he had resigned as director before the cheque transaction. The genuineness of the resignation, whether it was accepted by the company, and the timing and effect of Form No. 32 raised disputed questions of fact requiring evidence. Those controversies could not be resolved in quashing proceedings, so the complaint was permitted to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296608