<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1534 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AMARAVATHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296604</link>
    <description>The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was extended because the resolution applicant could not effectively carry out resolution functions when the corporate debtor had no accessible registered office, staff had left, records had not been handed over, and cooperation from erstwhile promoters and auditors was not forthcoming. The Committee of Creditors, holding the full voting share, nevertheless considered that the debtor could still be taken towards successful resolution and authorised the extension request. On that basis, continuation of the process was treated as necessary to complete the resolution exercise, and the extension was allowed for a further 60 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1534 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AMARAVATHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296604</link>
      <description>The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was extended because the resolution applicant could not effectively carry out resolution functions when the corporate debtor had no accessible registered office, staff had left, records had not been handed over, and cooperation from erstwhile promoters and auditors was not forthcoming. The Committee of Creditors, holding the full voting share, nevertheless considered that the debtor could still be taken towards successful resolution and authorised the extension request. On that basis, continuation of the process was treated as necessary to complete the resolution exercise, and the extension was allowed for a further 60 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>