https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296594 An election dispute placed before the Central Registrar was treated as a continuation of earlier objections, so the filing was not barred by limitation. The Court further held that the Registrar could admit the dispute after expiry of limitation on being satisfied that sufficient cause existed, and a separate formal condonation application was not mandatory where procedural strictness would defeat adjudication on merits. The High Court's order was set aside, and the matter was directed to proceed before the Central Registrar for decision on merits. en-us Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:18:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296594 An election dispute placed before the Central Registrar was treated as a continuation of earlier objections, so the filing was not barred by limitation. The Court further held that the Registrar could admit the dispute after expiry of limitation on being satisfied that sufficient cause existed, and a separate formal condonation application was not mandatory where procedural strictness would defeat adjudication on merits. The High Court's order was set aside, and the matter was directed to proceed before the Central Registrar for decision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296594