https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296589 For purposes of Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the period during which acquisition proceedings are stayed by a court order is excluded until the authority concerned is actually informed of the vacation of that stay. Here, although the stay was vacated on 23 July 2002, the Land Acquisition Collector received the certified vacation order only on 27 March 2003 and had remained under a bona fide impression that the restraint continued. On that basis, the award was treated as within time, the acquisition did not lapse, and the challenge to the proceedings failed. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:49:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296589 For purposes of Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the period during which acquisition proceedings are stayed by a court order is excluded until the authority concerned is actually informed of the vacation of that stay. Here, although the stay was vacated on 23 July 2002, the Land Acquisition Collector received the certified vacation order only on 27 March 2003 and had remained under a bona fide impression that the restraint continued. On that basis, the award was treated as within time, the acquisition did not lapse, and the challenge to the proceedings failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296589