<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1156 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410314</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the termination of a Petroleum Outlet Dealership based on a criminal conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court directed the respondent Corporation to allow the petitioner to continue operating the outlet, emphasizing the civil nature of such proceedings and reinstating the dealership agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1156 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410314</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the termination of a Petroleum Outlet Dealership based on a criminal conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court directed the respondent Corporation to allow the petitioner to continue operating the outlet, emphasizing the civil nature of such proceedings and reinstating the dealership agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>