https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410307 The court quashes C.C.No.283 of 2017 as the complaint against the petitioner lacks merit under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court finds that the petitioner was not directly involved in the business dealings leading to the dishonored cheque and emphasizes the necessity of debt or liability between the drawer and recipient for liability to apply. The judgment highlights the importance of properly including all liable parties in such cases and dismisses the complaint as legally unsustainable. en-us Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410307 The court quashes C.C.No.283 of 2017 as the complaint against the petitioner lacks merit under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court finds that the petitioner was not directly involved in the business dealings leading to the dishonored cheque and emphasizes the necessity of debt or liability between the drawer and recipient for liability to apply. The judgment highlights the importance of properly including all liable parties in such cases and dismisses the complaint as legally unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410307