<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1139 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee&#039;s actions were bona fide and based on valid approvals at the time of filing the return. The retrospective withdrawal of approval granted to the organization did not justify the imposition of penalties for inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1139 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee&#039;s actions were bona fide and based on valid approvals at the time of filing the return. The retrospective withdrawal of approval granted to the organization did not justify the imposition of penalties for inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>