<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1112 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410270</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the legal interpretations and factual assessments made in the case to resolve the issues regarding the appellant&#039;s tax treatment as an instrumentality and/or agency of the Government, applicability of perquisite computation rules, obligation to establish concessions, treatment as an assessee in default, and application of relevant income tax rules based on liability under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1112 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410270</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the legal interpretations and factual assessments made in the case to resolve the issues regarding the appellant&#039;s tax treatment as an instrumentality and/or agency of the Government, applicability of perquisite computation rules, obligation to establish concessions, treatment as an assessee in default, and application of relevant income tax rules based on liability under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>