<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1993 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296576</link>
    <description>The High Court granted interim relief to the petitioner, staying the disqualification notice and directing the revival of the DIN number and digital signature. The judgment addressed challenges related to the retrospective effect of the Companies Act 2013, cancellation of DIN, and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, ensuring a fair consideration of the issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1993 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296576</link>
      <description>The High Court granted interim relief to the petitioner, staying the disqualification notice and directing the revival of the DIN number and digital signature. The judgment addressed challenges related to the retrospective effect of the Companies Act 2013, cancellation of DIN, and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, ensuring a fair consideration of the issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>