https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296573 Disqualification notices under Section 164(2)(a) and strike-off action under Section 248(1) raised questions on interim interference, alleged breach of natural justice, retrospective operation of the Companies Act, 2013, and compliance with notice requirements under the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Registrar of Companies) Rules, 2016. The Court treated these issues as requiring adjudication, issued notice on the petition, and granted interim protection pending further hearing. Interim stay was also granted against the impugned disqualification notices, with revival of the petitioner's DIN numbers and digital signatures pending the next stage of proceedings. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:49:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296573 Disqualification notices under Section 164(2)(a) and strike-off action under Section 248(1) raised questions on interim interference, alleged breach of natural justice, retrospective operation of the Companies Act, 2013, and compliance with notice requirements under the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Registrar of Companies) Rules, 2016. The Court treated these issues as requiring adjudication, issued notice on the petition, and granted interim protection pending further hearing. Interim stay was also granted against the impugned disqualification notices, with revival of the petitioner's DIN numbers and digital signatures pending the next stage of proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296573