<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant challenges the directive to produce balance sheets during a pending Section 9 IBC application; appeal validity questioned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58955</link>
    <description>CIRP - Whether Appellant is justified to carry the appeal only because the Adjudicating Authority had given directions to produce the Balance Sheets? - The Application under Section 9 of IBC has been pending for long and against the spirit of provisions of IBC. The delay must be affecting the maximization of value of assets. The merits of the application under Section 9 have yet not been adjudicated and decided and so we are not entering in the issue whether there was a pre-existing dispute - It is apparent that for hearing the matter, the Adjudicating Authority needed a particular document which is even otherwise admittedly a public document. If that was so, there was no good reason to file the present appeal and to raise a dispute as has been raised.- AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:17:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:17:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant challenges the directive to produce balance sheets during a pending Section 9 IBC application; appeal validity questioned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58955</link>
      <description>CIRP - Whether Appellant is justified to carry the appeal only because the Adjudicating Authority had given directions to produce the Balance Sheets? - The Application under Section 9 of IBC has been pending for long and against the spirit of provisions of IBC. The delay must be affecting the maximization of value of assets. The merits of the application under Section 9 have yet not been adjudicated and decided and so we are not entering in the issue whether there was a pre-existing dispute - It is apparent that for hearing the matter, the Adjudicating Authority needed a particular document which is even otherwise admittedly a public document. If that was so, there was no good reason to file the present appeal and to raise a dispute as has been raised.- AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:17:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>