<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410262</link>
    <description>Customs duty exemption claims under the deemed export scheme must be decided on a complete consideration of the record. The HC held that the rejection was unsustainable because the authority relied mainly on a clarification letter and failed to examine contemporaneous documents supporting the claim that supplies were made for a new refinery project, including project approvals, extension of validity, a project authority certificate and later clarifications. This non-consideration of material evidence amounted to non-application of mind. The impugned orders were quashed and the matter remanded to the original authority for fresh consideration on merits after giving a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410262</link>
      <description>Customs duty exemption claims under the deemed export scheme must be decided on a complete consideration of the record. The HC held that the rejection was unsustainable because the authority relied mainly on a clarification letter and failed to examine contemporaneous documents supporting the claim that supplies were made for a new refinery project, including project approvals, extension of validity, a project authority certificate and later clarifications. This non-consideration of material evidence amounted to non-application of mind. The impugned orders were quashed and the matter remanded to the original authority for fresh consideration on merits after giving a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>