<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1101 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The decision was based on the grounds that estimating profit higher than declared, without evidence of fraud or willful neglect, did not warrant penalty, especially when the declared profit was already on the higher side compared to similar businesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1101 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The decision was based on the grounds that estimating profit higher than declared, without evidence of fraud or willful neglect, did not warrant penalty, especially when the declared profit was already on the higher side compared to similar businesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>