<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1057 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410215</link>
    <description>Rule 86A of the GST Rules authorises temporary blocking of utilisation of input tax credit where the authorised officer has recorded reasons to believe the credit was fraudulently availed or otherwise ineligible. The provision is a preventive, lien-like restriction on the electronic credit ledger and is distinct from recovery under Sections 74, 78 or 79. The expression &quot;input tax available&quot; refers to credit previously availed, not only the balance standing in the ledger on the date of the order. On that basis, the blocking order was within jurisdiction and not premature merely because adjudication and recovery proceedings were still pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1057 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410215</link>
      <description>Rule 86A of the GST Rules authorises temporary blocking of utilisation of input tax credit where the authorised officer has recorded reasons to believe the credit was fraudulently availed or otherwise ineligible. The provision is a preventive, lien-like restriction on the electronic credit ledger and is distinct from recovery under Sections 74, 78 or 79. The expression &quot;input tax available&quot; refers to credit previously availed, not only the balance standing in the ledger on the date of the order. On that basis, the blocking order was within jurisdiction and not premature merely because adjudication and recovery proceedings were still pending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>