<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 868 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296547</link>
    <description>In an appeal challenging an order passed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the tribunal considered whether notice should be issued and whether interim protection was warranted pending hearing. Notice was issued to the respondent, the appeal was directed to be listed after notice, and the impugned order was stayed until the next date of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 868 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296547</link>
      <description>In an appeal challenging an order passed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the tribunal considered whether notice should be issued and whether interim protection was warranted pending hearing. Notice was issued to the respondent, the appeal was directed to be listed after notice, and the impugned order was stayed until the next date of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>