<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26084</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue in the case involving M/s. Bhartiya Steel Industries. The court ruled that the escalation amount accrued in the relevant accounting year under the mercantile accounting system. It emphasized the interconnected nature of the claims and relied on legal precedents supporting the accrual of income. The judgment was concurred by Judge S. Monjula Bose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26084</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue in the case involving M/s. Bhartiya Steel Industries. The court ruled that the escalation amount accrued in the relevant accounting year under the mercantile accounting system. It emphasized the interconnected nature of the claims and relied on legal precedents supporting the accrual of income. The judgment was concurred by Judge S. Monjula Bose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>